Search Field Guide
Advanced Search
MT Gov Logo
Montana Field Guide

Montana Field Guides

Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir Forest
Global Name Central Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir Mesic Forest

Global Rank: G3?
State Rank: S4
 

General Description
In Montana, this group occurs on the east side of the Continental Divide, north to about the McDonald Pass area, and along the Rocky Mountain Front. This system is associated with a dry to submesic continental climate regime with annual precipitation ranging from 51 to 102 centimeters (20-40 inches), with a maximum in winter or late spring. Winter snowpacks typically melt off in early spring at lower elevations. Elevations range from valley bottoms to 1,980 meters (6500 feet) in northern Montana and up to 2,286 meters (7500 feet) on warm aspects in southern Montana. It occurs on north-facing aspects in most areas, and south-facing aspects at higher elevations. This is a Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) dominated system without any maritime floristic composition. Fire disturbance intervals are as infrequent as 500 years, and as a result, individual trees and forests can attain great age on some sites (500 to 1,500 years). In Montana, this system occurs from lower montane to lower subalpine environments and is prevalent on calcareous substrates. Common understory shrubs include common ninebark (Physocarpus malvaceus), common juniper (Juniperus communis), Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum), birch-leaf spiraea (Spiraea betulifolia), snowberry (Symphoricarpos species), creeping Oregon grape (Mahonia repens) and Canadian buffaloberry (Shepherdia canadensis). The Douglas-fir/pinegrass (Calamagrostis rubescens) type is the most ubiquitous association found within this system in Montana.

This Group incorporates portions of the Rocky Mountain Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest Ecological System and the Rocky Mountain Montane Douglas-fir Forest and Woodland.

Diagnostic Characteristics
Conifer Forest and Woodlands; Foothills and Montane Zone; Rocky Mountains; Mixed Severity Fires.

Typical Dominants: Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)

Similar Systems

Range
In Montana, this Group occurs primarily east of the Continental Divide where it may be found in all the island mountain ranges, in the mountains of the Rocky Mountain Front and along montane elevations along the Continental Divide. West of the Divide, it is found in more localized patches where it overlaps with G210.

In MT, G215 occurs within these Level III Ecoregions: 15 (Northern Rockies), 16 (Idaho Batholith), 17 (Middle Rockies), and 41 (Canadian Rockies).

In Montana, G215 occurs within these Major Land Resource Areas: 43A-Northern Rocky Mountains; 43B-Central Rocky Mountains, and 44A - Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys; 44B - Central Rocky Mountain Valleys, 46 - Northern and Central Rocky Mountain Foothills.

Spatial Pattern
Matrix

Environment
East of the Continental Divide, this group occurs on cold, dry to mesic sites in the montane zone. It is found on moderately dry mountain slopes and benches. It generally occurs on gravelly soils with good aeration and drainage. This system is subjected to a dry to sub-mesic continental climate. It often occurs at the lower treeline immediately above valley grasslands, or sagebrush steppe and shrublands.

Vegetation
This montane forest group is dominated by Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii).. Limber pine (Pinus flexilis) can co-occur on calcareous substrates, and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) is often frequent in these stands at higher elevations. Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) is found in some stands within the upper montane zone.

Understories may be dominated by shrubs or graminoids and includes species typical of the Rocky Mountains, in contrast to those of G210 which are supposed to have more of an Inland Pacific Northwest affinity. A potential realignment of Associations with G210 is needed before a comprehensive summary of understory vegetation can be provided that better distinguishes between the two groups. However, the following species are commonly associated with Douglas-fir habitats: common ninebark (Physocarpus malvaceus), common juniper (Juniperus communis), Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum) birch-leaf spiraea (Spiraea betulifolia), snowberry (Symphoricarpos species), creeping Oregon grape (Mahonia repens) and Canadian buffaloberry (Shepherdia canadensis). Dwarf huckleberry (Vaccinium caespitosum) or mountain huckleberry (Vaccinium membranaceum) are found on colder, mesic sites. Common graminoids include pinegrass (Calamagrostis rubescens), Ross’ sedge (Carex rossii), and Geyer’s sedge (Carex geyeri). Bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) and Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) are often common on sites adjacent to upper elevation montane grasslands. Common forbs within these forests include yarrow (Achillea millefolium), lanceleaf arnica (Arnica latifolia), pussytoes (Antennaria racemosa), wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana), and twinflower (Linnaea borealis).

In Montana, this group is currently composed of 11 Associations in 2 Alliances. However, the relationship of this group to G210 requires further evaluation. At a minimum, several Associations within these groups need to be realigned. It may be better to combine these two groups into one group due to the large amount of geographic and floristic overlap.

Dynamic Processes
Disturbances in these forests are primarily caused by fire and insects. Fire return intervals generally range from 20-45 years, although fire-free periods may be longer at more mesic or higher elevation sites (Steinberg 2002; U.S. Department of Agriculture 2012). The majority of fires are mixed-severity, although stand replacement and low-severity fires may also occur (U.S. Department of Agriculture 2012). Douglas-fir regenerates well following fire, with higher regeneration following low-severity burns (Harvey et al. 2013). After about 40 years, trees develop fire-resistant bark that promotes tolerance of low to moderate intensity surface fires (Steinberg 2002). In the absence of disturbance, Douglas-fir will continue to regenerate under shaded conditions, and becomes dominant in undisturbed stands.

Pre-settlement fire regimes may have been characterized by frequent, low intensity ground fires that maintained relatively open stands. Under present conditions, the fire regime is mixed severity and more variable, with stand-replacing fires more common, encouraging forest homogeneity. With vigorous fire suppression, longer fire-return intervals are now common, and multi-layered stands provide ladder fuels, making these forests more susceptible to high-intensity, stand-replacing fires. In some areas, these forests have been priorities for timber harvesting and grazing. An additional consequence of fire suppression has been the establishment of Douglas-fir in sagebrush steppe and grassland ecosystems in southwestern Montana. Historically, frequent fires confined Douglas-fir growth to particularly rocky or moist microsites. (Arno and Gruell 1986; Heyerdahl et al. 2006).

Fire additionally interacts with biotic disturbance dynamics in this system. The Douglas-fir bark beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae) causes abundant damage, and fire-affected stands tend to be more vulnerable to attack (Negron et al. 1999; Hood and Bentz 2007; Six and Skov 2009). A study from southwestern Montana found that large trees with high levels of crown scorch in dense stands were most vulnerable to beetle attack post-fire (Hood and Bentz 2007). In some cases, post-fire beetle infestations may spread to nearby trees not injured by fire (DeNitto et al. 2000). Post-fire mortality may also occur as the result of Douglas-fir tussock moth (Orgyia pseudotsugata), western spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis), and wood borers. Trees infected with Douglas-fir dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium douglasii) may be more susceptible to fire due to the accumulation of dense brooms that serve as ladder fuels (Steinberg 2002).

In recent years, these forests have been subjected to prolonged periods of drought, creating conditions where stands are susceptible to outbreaks of Douglas-fir tussock moth and Douglas-fir bark beetle. The combination of prolonged drought and fire suppression have also contributed to an increase in the intensity and duration of western spruce budworm epidemics, increased Douglas-fir bark beetle populations, and increased dwarf mistletoe infestation (Steinberg 2002). In addition to the effects of drought, disturbances such as snow breakage and windthrow may increase stand susceptibility to insect attack (Negron et al. 1999).

Management
In the absence of natural fire, periodic prescribed burns can be used to maintain this system. Low-severity burning decreases fuel loading, probability of stand-replacing fires, and increases available nutrients in the soil (Arno et al. 1995). Prescribed fire may additionally be useful for limiting invasion of Douglas-fir into sagebrush steppe and grassland ecosystems in southwestern Montana (Steinberg 2002; Heyerdahl et al. 2006). It may be important to consider the consequences of prescribed burning on stand susceptibility to Douglas-fir beetles, as beetles respond quickly to available resource pulses (i.e. fire damaged trees) following fire (Negron et al. 1999; Six and Skov 2009).

Restoration Considerations
Post-fire Douglas-fir forest restoration strategies will depend largely on the severity of the fire. Because these forests recover well following light to moderate intensity burns, restoration practices are generally not necessary. Recovery may be slow after large-scale stand-replacing fires, as seeds are wind-dispersed and rely on nearby stands to provide a seed source. Severely burned sites on steep slopes will require sediment retention and erosion control actions before and during restoration. When supplemental seeding or planting is necessitated, Douglas-fir establishment is best on mineral soil or thin organic seedbeds, and survival is greatest at relatively dry sites with partial shading (Steinberg 2002). Prescribed fire may be an additional valuable restoration strategy in stands with high levels of dwarf mistletoe. High severity burning controls Douglas-fir dwarf mistletoe by eliminating infected trees and promoting regeneration of uninfected individuals (Alexander and Hawksworth 1976). However, when utilizing prescribed burning as a restoration strategy, the effects of fire on local Douglas-fir beetle populations should be considered.

Original Concept Authors
M.S. Reid and K.A. Schulz

Montana Version Authors
S. Mincemoyer

Version Date
12/4/2024


Login Logout
Citation for data on this website:
Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir Forest — Central Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir Mesic Forest.  Montana Field Guide.  Retrieved on , from