View in other NatureServe Network Field Guides
NatureServe
Montana
Utah
Wyoming
Idaho
Wisconsin
British Columbia
South Carolina
Yukon
California
New York
Spiny Plumeless-thistle - Carduus acanthoides
Other Names:
Plumeless Thistle, Welted Thistle
Non-native Species
Global Rank:
GNR
State Rank:
SNA
(see State Rank Reason below)
C-value:
0
Agency Status
USFWS:
USFS:
BLM:
External Links
State Rank Reason (see State Rank above)
Carduus acanthoides is a forb that is native to portions of Eurasia and was introduced into North America (Giblin et al. [eds.] 2018). A conservation status rank is not applicable (SNA) because Carduus acanthoides is a non-native vascular plant in Montana that is not a suitable target for conservation activities.
General Description
PLANTS: Stout, tall, annual or biennial forbs with erect, spiny-winged stems, 30-150 cm tall. Sources: Lesica et al. 2022
LEAVES: Basal and cauline (stem) – all spiny margined. Basal leaves have winged petioles. Stem leaves alternately arranged, sessile, and reduced upwards in size. Blades oblanceolate, pinnately lobed, and 1-2 cm long. Lower surface is mostly glabrous except for long, curled septate hairs along veins. Sources: Keil in Flora of North America (FNA) 2006; Giblin et al. [eds.] 2018; Lesica et al. 2022
INFLORESCENCE: An array of racemes with erect, purple clustered flower heads on long, spiny peduncles, 2-30 cm long. Flower heads are composed of involucral bracts, bristles, and disk florets (discoid) on a receptacle, less than 4 cm wide. Involucral Bracts linear-lanceolate in shape, often narrower than appressed base, unequal, 1.5-2 cm tall, and less than 2 mm wide. Forming 7-10 rows, the outer bracts are spine-tipped and inner are purple, unarmed, and long-attenuate. Disc Florets have stamens and pistil (perfect), 13-20 mm long; petals purple, occasionally white, narrow, and linear-lobed. Pappus minutely barbed, 11-13 mm long. Sources: Keil in Flora of North America (FNA) 2006; Giblin et al. [eds.] 2018; Lesica et al. 2022
TAXONOMY & NOMENCLATURE
Carduus is an old name for ‘thistle’.
Populations in the Pacific Northwest belong to subspecies acanthoides.
Phenology
Flowering June through October.
Diagnostic Characteristics
On first-glance thistles can look similar, but upon a closer inspection differences become apparent.
Thistles belong to the genera of
Cirsium,
Carduus, and
Onopordum, which all have spiny-margined leaves and often have flower heads with spiny bracts. Ecologically, native and non-native thistles are very different.
NATIVE versus NON-NATIVE THISTLES [
Parkinson and Mangold 2015]
Native Thistles* Grow relatively sparsely and possess few or gentler spines, intermix with many plant species, and are slow to colonize disturbed ground.
* Flowers provide nectar and pollen for numerous native birds and insects, and forage for some wildlife. For example, elk eat the flowers of Elk Thistle.
* Tend to have involucral bracts that adhere to the flower head for most of their length (except for the spine).
* Are
not rhizomatous except for Flodman’s Thistle which can produce horizontal runner roots.
Non-native Thistles* Colonize disturbed ground quickly, often form dense patches, and produce nastier spines - limiting recreational activities, injuring people/animals, and reducing native plant species diversity.
* Flowers provide nectar and pollen for some birds and insects, but not for wildlife or livestock.
* Some species are aggressively rhizomatous and outcompete native plants that provide nutritional forage.
* Require management to control, reduce, or remove. Refer to the MANAGEMENT subsection.
DIFFERENTIATING THISTLE GENERACarduus* Stems: Winged.
* Pappus: Barbellate (capillary) - of minutely barbed, narrow bristles. Bristles usually fall separately.
* Flower Head Receptacle: Not obviously fleshy or honeycombed. Densely bristly. In the flower head, look for bristles between the florets.
Cirsium* Stems: Winged or not winged.
* Pappus: Feathery (plumose) - of fine, long hairs on each side of the central axis (rib).
* Flower Head Receptacle: Densely bristly. In the flower head, look for bristles between the florets.
Onopordum* Stems: Spiny and winged along their entire length.
* Pappus: Barbellate (capillary) - of minutely barbed, narrow bristles. Bristles connected at base.
* Flower Head Receptacle: Definitively fleshy and honeycombed. No or very sparse and short bristles. In the flower head, look between the florets to find nothing.
IDENTIFYING CARDUUS SPECIESSpiny Plumeless Thistle -
Carduus acanthoides, non-native and undesirable
* Plants: Annual or biennial.
* Flower Heads: Several per stem and sessile or short-pedunculate. Involucres of less than 2 cm tall and less than 4 cm wide. Generally, erect with maturity.
* Involucral Bracts: Narrowly triangular - less than 2mm wide- with smooth margins and widest at base. Outer (lower) bracts spine-tipped and a short spine-tip.
* Disk flowers: white or purple.
Musk Thistle -
Carduus nutans, non-native and undesirable
* Plants: Usually biennial; occasionally annual.
* Flower Heads: Mostly solitary. Involucres of 2-4 cm tall and 4-8 cm wide. Nodding with maturity.
* Involucral Bracts: Broadly triangular – at least 2mm wide - with smooth margins and wide at mid-length. Outer (lower) bracts spine-tipped.
* Disk flowers: purple.
Species Range
Montana Range
Range Descriptions
Non-native
Range Comments
Introduced to the northern USA from Eurasia (Lesica et al. 2022; Giblin et al. [eds.] 2018).
Observations in Montana Natural Heritage Program Database
Number of Observations: 329
(Click on the following maps and charts to see full sized version)
Map Help and Descriptions
Relative Density
Recency
(Observations spanning multiple months or years are excluded from time charts)
Habitat
Spiny Plumeless-thistle grows in fields, roadsides, and disturbed grasslands in valley zones in Montana (Lesica et al. 2022).
Ecology
POLLINATORS The following animal species have been reported as pollinators of this plant species or its genus where their geographic ranges overlap:
Bombus vagans,
Bombus auricomus,
Bombus borealis,
Bombus fervidus,
Bombus pensylvanicus,
Bombus bimaculatus,
Bombus griseocollis, and
Bombus impatiens (Thorp et al. 1983, Colla and Dumesh 2010, Williams et al. 2014, Tripoldi and Szalanski 2015).
Reproductive Characteristics
Plants reproduce by seed.
FRUIT
Fruit is a cypsela or an achene. It is a dry, single-seeded fruit that formed from a double ovary. It is fused to the calyx, but the pericarp (fruit wall) and seed coat are separate (free from each other). Pericarp is thick-walled, hard, nutlike, and with receptacular attachments (Keil in FNA 2006). The achene is ovoid, glabrous, and 4-5 mm long. Chromosome number of 2n=22 (Keil in FNA 2006).
HYBRIDS
Carduus nutans and Carduus acanthoides have been documented to hybridize in Ontario, Canada and Wisconsin, USA where parent species co-occur (Keil in FNA 2006).
Fruit is an achene, ovoid, glabrous, and 2-3 mm long.
Management
COUNTY & STATE DESIGNATIONSIn 2024, Spiny Plumeless-thistle is listed as
County Noxious in Lincoln County, Montana.
INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENTSuccessful management of non-native thistles requires that land-use objectives and a desired plant community be identified (Shelly et al. in Sheley and Petroff 1999). Once identified, an
integrated weed management strategy that promotes a weed-resistant plant community and serves other land-use objectives, such as for livestock forage, wildlife habitat, or recreation, can be developed.
PREVENTION [Adapted from Piper in Sheley and Petroff 1999]
Preventing the establishment of non-native thistles can be accomplished by many practices:
* Learn how to differentiate “native” from “non-native” thistles and their species. Refer also to DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTERISTICS.
* Prevent vehicles from driving through, and animals from grazing within, infested areas.
* Thoroughly wash the undercarriage of vehicles and wheels in a designated area before moving to an un-infested area.
* Frequently monitor for new plants, and when found implement effective control methods (Early-Detection and Rapid-Response).
* Maintain proper grazing management that creates resilience to noxious and non-native weed invasion.
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL [Adapted from Winston et al. 2012 and 2016; NRCS 2019)
A fair amount of preliminary work and an array of factors must be considered when developing a biocontrol plan for controlling thistles. Readers are encouraged to consult the "Useful Links" and cited literature in this profile.
Biological control agents approved for Spiny Plumeless-Thistle in the USA include:
Nodding Thistle Gall Fly (
Urophora solstitialis) has rarely been found on Spiny Plumeless-thistle in the places where it was released.
Musk Thistle Flower Fly (
Cheilosia corydon) uses Spiny Plumeless-Thistle as a host plant.
Biological control insects no longer approved or not recommended include:
Thistle Crown Weevil (
Trichosirocalus horridus) was released in 1974, in USA, and 1975, in Canada, to control exotic thistles – specifically Spiny Plumeless-thistle and
Musk Thistle (Winston et al. 2016). However, through natural spread Thistle Crown Weevil attacked both non-native and native
Cirsium thistles. As a result, interstate transport is not permitted in the USA, and some states have prohibited redistribution of the insect within their borders. It is critical that re-distribution of this species does not occur into places where it is either banned or not present and native thistles are known or suspected to occur.
In Montana Thistle Crown Weevil prefers Musk Thistle over Spiny Plumeless-thistle. The weevil is effective in controlling thistle populations when in combination with either other biocontrol agents and/or competition from other plant species. At many sites the insect has been ineffective with limited damage. Thistle Crown Weevil attacks the rosettes, but there has been enough survival to allow these thistles to produce some seed.
CHEMICAL CONTROLS [Adapted from Winston et al. 2012]
Herbicides can be effective, especially when properly integrated with a weed management plan. The herbicide type and concentration, application time and method, environmental constraints, land use practices, local regulations, and other factors will determine its effectiveness and impact to non-target species. Strict adherence to application requirements defined on the herbicide label will reduce risks to human and environmental health. Consult your County Extension Agent and/or Weed District for information on herbicidal control. Chemical information is also available at
Greenbook.
The most widely used products include, but are not limited to:
Aminopyralid can be applied in the spring or early summer on rosettes and bolting plants or in the autumn on rosettes. Aminopyralid is less detrimental to desirable broadleaf plants – though legume species are an exception.
clopyralid can be used on young, actively growing thistles prior to the bud stage or on rosettes in the autumn. Clopyralid does not injure established grasses.
Picloram can be used on thistles at all life stages. Picloram is a restrict-use herbicide because it is persistent, yet mobile in the soil, and can contaminate water.
Dicamba can be used on
Carduus species that are emerging or actively growing. It is best to apply on small thistles, prior to flowering, or in autumn on rosettes.
2,4-D can be used on young and actively growing annual and biennial species of non-native thistle.
Metsulfuron should be applied after emergence when non-native thistles are actively growing. Results are better when used with a nonionic or organosilicone surfactant. Restrictions on grazing or with some grasses apply with its use.
PHYSICAL CONTROLS [Adapted from Winston et al. 2012]
Tilling in agricultural settings can effectively control
Carduus thistles if done on a timely basis and if roots are cut below the soil surface (root crown). Tilling can be more effective when combined with an herbicide application. Tilling is not practical or desirable in wildlands or nature preserves. Tilling and disking are not compatible where biological control is used because it disrupts the organism’s life cycle.
Mowing as close to the ground, as practical, and before flower heads bloom can reduce seed production and spread of
Carduus thistles. Once the terminal flower heads start blooming, un-cut stems can recover, branch, flower, and seed. A single mowing treatment will not injure the root system but is effective for annual and biennial species. Mowing in the summer prior to an autumn herbicide application will improve coverage of the chemical that falls on the rosette leaves. Mowing may be incompatible with some biological control agents. Mowing should be timed appropriate to work with the life cycle of the biological control agent to prevent unwanted removal of insects, galls, etc.
CULTURAL CONTROLS [Adapted from Winston et al. 2012]
Seeding can help establish competitive native and desirable grasses and forbs where there is an infestation of
Carduus thistles. Within two years, typically, of establishing competitive grasses then biological control agents can be introduced. Establishing native and desirable competitive vegetation is one of the more successful long-term weed control methods.
Prescribed or cultural fire can control non-native thistles, but success is dependent upon the season of burn, burn severity, site conditions, and plant community composition and phenology. If used in conjunction with native plant seeding, especially those that flourish with fire, then plants will create natural competition against non-native thistles. If used in conjunction with herbicides than non-native thistle control can improve though impacts to soils should be considered. Biological control agents must be able to survive controlled burns that aid in returning native vegetation to previous thistle-infested areas – as determined by the agent, fire severity, and timing of the burn.
Grazing by livestock is generally not an effective control for non-native thistle infestations because the spiny leaves, stems, and flower heads are not very palatable. Cattle have been observed in many places to nip the flower heads of Musk Thistle and later spit them out onto the road (Pipp personal communication).
Useful Links:Montana Invasive Species websiteMontana Biological Weed Control Coordination Project Field Guide for Biological Control of Weeds in Montana Montana Department of Agriculture - Noxious WeedsMontana Weed Control AssociationMontana Weed Control Association - Weed District ContactsMontana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks - Noxious WeedsMontana State University Integrated Pest Management ExtensionWeed Publications at Montana State University Extension - MontGuides
Stewardship Responsibility
Threats or Limiting Factors
Spiny Plumeless-thistle is an aggressive non-native weed (Keil in FNA 2006). In pasturelands Spiny Plumeless-thistle displaces and suppresses growth of other plants (Desrochers et al. 1988). Further, its presence limits access of grazing animals to other more palatable plants (Desrochers et al. 1988). Plants can sometimes grow in dense stands (Keil in FNA 2006).
References
- Literature Cited AboveLegend:
View Online Publication
Colla, S.R. and S. Dumesh. 2010. The bumble bees of southern Ontario: notes on natural history and distribution. Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario 141:39-68.
Lesica, P., M.T. Lavin, and P.F. Stickney. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT Press. viii + 771 p.
Parkinson, Hilary and Jane Mangold. 2015. Guide to Exotic Thistles of Montana and How to Differentiate from Native Thistles. EB0221. Montana State University Extension, Bozeman, Montana.
Thorp, R.W., D.S. Horning, and L.L. Dunning. 1983. Bumble bees and cuckoo bumble bees of California (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Bulletin of the California Insect Survey 23:1-79.
Tripoldi, A.D. and A.L. Szalanski. 2015. The bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) of Arkansas, fifty years later. Journal of Melittology 50: doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.v0i50.4834
Williams, P., R. Thorp, L. Richardson, and S. Colla. 2014. Bumble Bees of North America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 208 p.
Winston, Rachel L., Carol Bell Randdall, Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate, Alec McClay, Jennifer Andreas, and Mark Schwarzlander. 2016. Field Guide For The Biological Control of Weeds In The Northwest. August 2016 Reprint. FHTET-2014-08. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, University of Idaho Extension and USDA Department of Agriculture.
Winston, Rachel, Rich Hansen, mark Schwarzlander, Eric Coombs, Carol Bell Randall, and Rodney Lym. 2012. Biology and Biological Control of Exotic True Thistles. Third Edition, April. FHTET-2007-05. Forest health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, US Department of Agriculture.
- Additional ReferencesLegend:
View Online Publication
Do you know of a citation we're missing?
Lesica, P., M.T. Lavin, and P.F. Stickney. 2022. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants, Second Edition. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT Press. viii + 779 p.
Olliff, Tom, Roy Renkin, Craig McClure, Paul Miller, Dave Price, Dan Reinhart, and Jennifer Whipple. 2001. Managing A Complex Exotic Vegetation Program in Yellowstone National Park.
- Web Search Engines for Articles on "Spiny Plumeless-thistle"